Højre
The Right
The Right
No affiliated group in the European Parliament
Change of +2.4 since last election
+0.6 in the last 3 months
The foundation of Højre rested on a hierarchical and organic view of society. It regarded the state as the guardian of stability and tradition, with the authority of the monarch and landowners serving as a natural safeguard against the 'tyranny of the majority.' Its view of human nature was characterized by skepticism towards radical change.
Højre's agenda primarily focused on safeguarding the interests of the aristocracy, the senior bureaucracy, and the affluent bourgeoisie. A central issue was the expansion of defense installations, particularly the fortification of Copenhagen, which led to fierce budgetary conflicts. The party advocated for a strong nation-state and long resisted the principle of parliamentary governance to limit the influence of the rural population. Its policies were aimed at those circles seeking to ensure social peace through authority and economic stability.
Strategically, Højre acted as a bulwark of the executive against the legislature. For decades, it supported governments that operated without a majority in the elected lower house, leveraging the power of the upper house and the King's trust. This policy of obstruction led to a profound constitutional crisis, which only ended in 1901 with a fundamental system change. Ultimately, the party had to bow to parliamentarism, transforming in 1915 into the Conservative People's Party, marking the transition from an elite party to a modern mass party.
Total Duration: -
Total Duration: -
Total Duration: -
The party participated in government for 0% of the legislative period.
A comprehensive research database from the University of Bremen, documenting parties, elections, and governments for comparative analysis.ParlGov – Parliamentary Democracy Data
Döring, Holger and Philip Manow. 2024. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov).
The leading expert survey on party positions in Europe. Over 400 political scientists document party stances based on rigorous scientific criteria.CHES – Chapel Hill Expert Survey
Rovny, Jan, et al. “25 Years of Political Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey, 1999-2024.”