Germany
Election trend
Parties

Should misleading names on food packaging be more closely regulated?

Poll results

Should misleading names on food packaging be more closely regulated?
Support
Reject
Don't know
89%
6%
5%
PolitPro Community – 3129 respondents – 14.08.2023-21.08.2023

Poll information

Should misleading names on food packaging be more closely regulated? 89% of respondents are in favor of regulating misleading names on food packaging more strongly, while 6% are against.

:undecided% chose the answer "Don't know". The survey was conducted among 3129 users of the PolitPro app during 14.08.2023-21.08.2023. The results are not representative, but may give a rough idea of the political mood around the issue.

Pros - What's in favor?

  1. Consumer protection: stronger regulation of misleading names is critical to providing consumers with accurate and transparent information about products. Misleading labels can lead to confusion and deprive consumers of the ability to make informed decisions about their diets.
  2. Health implications: Misleading labels can lead consumers to mistakenly believe a product is healthier or more nutritious than it actually is. This can lead to poor nutrition and cause long-term health problems. Stronger regulation would ensure that labels on food packaging accurately reflect the product's true contents and attributes.
  3. Fair competition: misleading labels can lead manufacturers to make their products appear more attractive or healthier, even though they may not offer any particular benefits. This can distort competition and disadvantage companies that provide honest and accurate information. Stronger regulation would ensure that all manufacturers have a level playing field and compete based on their actual attributes.

Cons - What's against it?

  1. Flexibility for businesses: Some argue that too much regulation could limit the flexibility of companies to present their products in an appealing way and communicate their brand identity. They see the responsibility primarily on the consumer to critically scrutinize the information on packaging and make informed decisions for themselves.
  2. Over-regulation: Critics fear that greater regulation could lead to over-regulation, resulting in unnecessary costs and bureaucracy for companies. They argue that existing laws and regulations are already sufficient to combat deceptive practices and that additional regulation could unnecessarily restrict the market.
  3. Consumer responsibility: some argue that consumers have a responsibility to critically read and interpret information on food packaging. They emphasize the importance of education and being informed so that consumers are able to make informed decisions and avoid irref